Читать книгу Pensar, debatir y aportar a las relaciones internacionales - Varios autores - Страница 20

AA.VV. (2007). Número especial consagrado a Edward Said. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36(1).

ACHARYA, A. y BUZAN, B. (eds.) (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge.

ACHARYA, A. y BUZAN, B. (2019). The Making of Global International Relations. Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ADLER-NISSEN, R. (2013). Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. Oxon: Routledge.

ARON, R. (1963). Philosophie et Histoire (Cours enseignés à la Sorbonne). Recuperado de https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/les-conferences-du-soir/raymond-aron-15

ASHLEY, R. y WALKER, R. B. J. (1990). Speaking the language of exile: Dissident thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259-268.

AYOOB, M. (1986). Regional security and the Third World. En Mohammed Ayoob (ed.), Regional Security in the Third World. Case Studies from Southeast Asia and the Middle East (pp. 3-23). London: Croom Helm.

AYOOB, M. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Order and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

AYOOB, M. (1998). Subaltern realism: International relations theory meets the Third World. En Stephanie G. Neuman (ed.), International Relations Theory and the Third World (pp. 31-54). New York: St Martin’s Press.

BADIE, B. (2012). Nouveaux mondes: Carnets d’après Guerre Froide. Paris: Le Monde Interactif/CNRS Editions.

BLOOR, D. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

BLYDEN, E. W. (1994 [1888]). Christianity. Islam and the Negro Race. Baltimore: Black Classic Press.

BOURDIEU, P. (1977 [1972]). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Homo academicus. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

BOURDIEU, P. (1999 [1993]). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity.

BOURDIEU, P. (1994). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.

BOURDIEU, P. y WACQUANT, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: The University of Chicago.

BRAILLARD, P. y DJALILI, M. R. (1988). Les relations internationales. Paris: PUF.

BROWN, C. (2013). The poverty of Grand Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494321

BULL, H. y WATSON, A. (eds.) (1984). The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

BUTLER, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York, London: Routledge.

BUTLER, J. (2015). Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

BUZAN, B. (2011). The inaugural Kenneth N. Waltz annual lecture. A world without superpowers: Decentered globalism. International Relations, 25(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117810396999

BUZAN, B. (2018a). How and how not to develop IR theory: Lessons from core and periphery. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(4), 391-414. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy013

BUZAN, B. (2018b). Great Powers. En Alexandra Gheciu y William C. Wohlforth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.013.43

BUZAN, B. y LAWSON, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BUZAN, B. y WÆVER, O. (2006 [2003]). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CABRAL, A. (1966). The Weapon of Theory (Discurso pronunciado durante la Primera Conferencia Tricontinental de los Pueblos de Asia, África y America Latina). La Habana.

CÉSAIRE, A. (1959 [1939]). Cahier d’un retour au pays natal. Paris: Présence Africaine.

DEER, C. (2008). Doxa. En M. Grenfeld (ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 119-130). Stocksfield: Acumen.

DELVEN, B., JAMES, P. y ÖZDAMAR, Ö. (2005). The English School, International Relations, and Progress. International Studies Review, 7, 171-197.

DIAWARA, M. (1990). Reading Africa through Foucault V. Y. Mudimbe’s reaffirmation of the subject. October, 55, 79-92.

DIOP, A. (1947). Niam n’goura ou les raisons d’être de Présence Africaine. Présence Africaine, 1(1), 7-14.

DIOP, C. A. (2000 [1954]). Nations nègres et culture: de l’Antiquité égyptienne aux problèmes culturels de l’Afrique noire d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Editions Présence Africaine.

DIOP, C. A. (1967). Antériorité des civilisations nègres : mythe ou réalité historique ? Paris: Présence Africaine.

DIOP, C. A. (1982 [1979]). L’Unité culturelle de l’Afrique noire. Paris: Editions Présence Africaine.

DUBAR, C. (2007). Les sociologues face au langage et à l’individu. Langage et société, 3(121-122), 29-43.

DUNNE, T. (2018). Ethical foreign policy in a multipolar world. En C. Brown y R. Eckersley (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.36

DUNNE, T. y REUS-SMIT, C. (2017). The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ELDEM, E. (2018). L’Empire Ottoman et la Turquie face à l’Occident. Introducción. Cours enseignés au Collège de France. Recuperado de https://www.college-de-france.fr/site/edhem-eldem/course-2017-2018.htm

ENLOE, C. (2014 [1990]). Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

ENLOE, C. (2004). Gender is not enough: The need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs, 80, 95-97. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x

FANON, F. (2002 [1961]). Les damnés de la terre. Paris: La découverte.

FRASSON-QUENOZ, F. (2016). Latin American thinking in international relations reloaded. OASIS, 23, 53-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n23.04

FRASSON-QUENOZ, F. (2018). Doxa y heterodoxias en Relaciones Internacionales. Un acercamiento sociohistórico al pensamiento científico. En F. Frasson-Quenoz et. al., Teorías sobre relaciones internacionales. Perspectivas y lecturas desde América Latina. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

GLASER, C. L. y KAUFFMANN, C. (1998). What is the offense-defense balance and can we measure it? International Security, 22(4), 44-82.

GUERRA, F.-X. (1992). Modernidad e independencias. Ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispánicas. Madrid: MAPFRE.

GUZZINI, S. (1993). Structural power: The limits of neorealist power analysis. International Organization, 47(3), 443-478.

HAGMANN, J. y BIERSTEKER, T. J. (2014). Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 291-315.

HANSEN, L. (2015). Ontologies, epistemologies, methodologies. En L. J. Shepherd (ed.), Gender Matters in Global Politics. A Feminist Introduction to International Relations (pp. 14-23). New York: Routledge.

HARDING, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

HARDY, C. (2008). Hysteresis. En M. Grenfeld (ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp.131-148). Stocksfield: Acumen.

HORTON, J. A. (1969 [1868]). West African Countries and Peoples. Edinburgh: University Press of Edinburgh.

HOUNTONDJI, P. J. (1996 [1983]). African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

HOUNTONDJI, P. J. (1991). African philosophy: Myth and reality. En T. Serequeberhan (dir.), African Philosophy, The Essential Readings. St. Paul: Paragon House.

HOWLETT, M.-V. y FONKOUA, R. (2009). La maison Présence Africaine. Présence Africaine, 10(especial), 106-133.

IKENBERRY, G. J. y MASTANDUNO, M. (eds.) (2003). International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific. New York: Columbia University.

INSIGHT CRIME (2018). Brazil Homicides Reach New Record Levels: Report. Recuperado de https://www.insightcrime.org/news/brief/brazil-homicides-new-record-levels-report/

JACKSON, P. T. (2011). The Conduct Of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge.

JAGGAR, A. M. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. London: Harvest Press.

KI-ZERBO, J. (1957). Histoire et conscience nègre. Paris: Présence Africaine.

KI-ZERBO, J. (2011 [1978]). Historia del África Negra. De los orígenes a las independencias. Barcelona: Edicions bellatierra.

LAVINAS PICQ, M. y THIEL, M. (eds.) (2015). Sexualities in World Politics. How LGBTQ Claims Shape International Relations. Oxon: Routledge.

LEHMANN, K. E. (2017). Is regionalism still a viable option for the creation and maintenance of peace and security in Latin America? En M. A.G. Suarez, R. Duarte Villa y B. Weiffen (eds.), Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

LINKLATER, A. y SUGANAMI, H. (2006). The English School of International Relations. A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MCSWEENEY, B. (1996). Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhaguen school. Review of International Studies, 22(1), 81-93.

MEARSHEIMER, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.

MEARSHEIMER, J. J. (2016). Benign Hegemony. International Studies Review, 18(1), 147-9.

MEARSHEIMER, J. J. y WALT, S. (2013). Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic Hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494320

MIGNOLO, W. D. (2018). Decoloniality and phenomenology: The geopolitics of knowing and epistemic/ontological colonial differences. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 32(3), 360-387.

NKRUMAH, N. (1998 [1963]). Africa Must Unite. London: Panaf.

NYE, J. S. JR. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

PATTERSON, M. y MONROE, K. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315-331.

PERSAUD, R. B. y SAJED, A. (2018). Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations: Postcolonial Perspectives. Abdington: Routledge.

QUIJANO, A. (2000a). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Journal of World Systems Research, 6(2), 342-386.

QUIJANO, A. (2000b). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. En E. Lander (comp.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 122-151). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

QUIJANO, A. (2014). Cuestiones y horizontes. De la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

RAHMAN, M. (2015). Sexual diffusions and conceptual confusions: Muslim homophobia and muslim homosexualities in the context of modernity. En M. Lavinas Picq y M. Thiel (eds.), Sexualities in World Politics. How LGBTQ Claims Shape International Relations (pp. 92-107). Oxon: Routledge.

RAHMAN, M. (2018). Postcolonialism and International Relations: Intersections of sexualities, religion and race. En R. Perseaud y A. Sajed (eds.), Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations. Postcolonial Perspectives (pp. 99-115). Oxon: Routledge.

SAID, E. W. (2003 [1978]). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Londres London: Penguin Books.

SAKAR, B. K. (1919). Hindu theory of International Relations. The American Political Science Review, 13(3), 400-414.

SALTER, M. B. (2010). Edward Said and post-colonial international relations. En C. Moore y C. Farrands (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy (pp. 129-143). London: Routledge.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) (2019). Recuperado de: https://www.scimagojr.com/

SENGHOR, L. S. (1964). Liberté 1: négritude et humanisme. Paris: Le Seuil.

SETH, S. (1998). Postcolonial studies: a beginning. Postcolonial Studies, 1(1), 7-11.

SETH, S. (2011). Postcolonial theory and the critique of international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 167-183.

SETH, S. (ed.) (2013). Postcolonial Theory and International Relations. A critical Introduction. Oxon: Routledge.

SHEPHERD, L. J. (2008). Power and authority in the production of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 383-404.

SPIVAK, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? En C. Nelson y L. Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

SPIVAK, G. C. (2000). Can the subaltern speak? En D. Brydon (ed.), Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies (vol. IV, pp.1427-1477). London: Routledge.

SUBRAHMANYAN, S. (2016). L'éléphant, le canon et le pinceau. Paris: Alma Editeur.

TICKNER, A. (2008). Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico, International Studies Review, 10(4), 735-748.

TICKNER, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenhau's principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429-440.

TICKNER, J. A. (2001). Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia Press University.

TICKNER, J. A. (2014). A Feminist Voyage Through International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TICKNER, A. y BLANEY, D. (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge.

TICKNER, A. y WÆVER, O. (eds.) (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World. Abingdon: Routledge.

TRUE, J. (2003). Mainstreaming gender in global public policy. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 368-396.

TURNER, O. y NYMALM, N. (2019). Morality and progress: IR narratives on international revisionism and the status quo. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623173

VELA ORBEGOZO, B. (2010). Contribución al debate sobre la formación del Estado colombiano en el Siglo XIX. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

VITALIS, R. (2015). White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations – The United States in the World. New York: Cornell University Press.

WALTZ, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.

WEBER, C. (2014). The Gentrification of International Theory. Recuperado de http://www.isanet.org/publications/isq/posts/id/313/The-Gentrification-of-International-Theory

WEMHEUER-VOGELAAR, W., BELL, N. J., NAVARRETE MORALES, M. y TIERNEY, M. J. (2016). The IR of the beholder: Examining global IR using the 2014 TRIP survey. International Studies Review, 18(1), 16-32.

YANG, Y. (2018). Escape both the “Thucydides Trap” and the Churchill Trap”: Finding a third type of great power relations under the bipolar system. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(2), 193-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy002