Читать книгу Familien- und Erbrecht - Ute Brenneisen - Страница 141

Anmerkungen

Оглавление

[1]

BGH Urt. v. 13.11.1963 (Az. V ZR 56/62) = BGHZ 40, 218.

[2]

Siehe dazu im Skript „Sachenrecht II“ unter Rn. 70 ff.

[3]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1365 Rn. 15; BGH Beschl. v. 12.1.1989 (Az. V ZB 1/88) = FamRZ 1989, 475.

[4]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1365 Rn. 6.

[5]

BGH Urt. v. 12.7.1989 (Az. IVb ZR 79/88) = FamRZ 1989, 1051.

[6]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1365 Rn. 5.

[7]

Ermann-Budzikiewicz § 1365 Rn. 8; Rittner FamRZ 1961, 1, 90 ff.

[8]

BGH Beschl. v. 28.4.1961 (Az. V ZB 17/60) = BGHZ 35, 135; BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174; BGH Urt. v. 5.6.1980 (Az. IVb ZR 516/80) = NJW 1980, 2350.

[9]

BGH Urt. v. 25.6.1980 (Az. IVb ZR 516/80) = BGHZ 77, 299.

[10]

BGH Urt. v. 25.6.1980 (Az. IVb ZR 516/80) = NJW 1980, 2350.

[11]

BGH Beschl. v. 28.4.1961 (Az. V ZB 17/60) = BGHZ 35, 135; BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174; OLG München Urt. v. 14.1.2004 (Az. 16 UF 1348/03) = FamRZ 2005, 272.

[12]

BGH Beschl. v. 14.6.2007 (Az. V ZB 102/06) = NJW 2007, 3127.

[13]

BGH Urt. v. 12.7.1989 (Az. IVb ZR 79/88) = FamRZ 1989, 1051; BGH Urt. v. 25.6.1993 (Az. V ZR 7/92) = FamRZ 1993, 1302.

[14]

BGH Beschl. v. 14.6.2007 (Az. V ZB 102/06) = NJW 2007, 3127.

[15]

Gernhuber JZ 1966, 192; Beitzke DB 1961, 22.

[16]

BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174; BGH Urt. v. 25.6.1980 (Az. IVb ZR 516/80) = NJW 1980, 2350; BGH Urt. v. 23.6.1983 (Az. IX ZR 47/82) = NJW 1984, 609.

[17]

BGH Beschl. v. 12.1.1989 (Az. V ZB 1/88) = NJW 1989, 1609; BGH Urt. v. 16.5.1990 (Az. XII ZR 37/89) = FamRZ 1990, 970.

[18]

OLG Köln Beschl. v. 26.5.2004 (Az. 16 Wx 80/04) = NJW-RR 2005, 1.

[19]

BGH Urt. v. 23.6.1983 (Az. IX ZR 47/82) = FamRZ 1983, 1101; OLG Köln Beschl. v. 2.5.2000 (Az. 26 WF 69/00) = FamRZ 2001, 176.

[20]

BGH Urt. v. 2.12.1981 (Az. IVb ZR 553/80) = NJW 1982, 1100.

[21]

BGH Urt. v. 30.3.1994 (Az. XII ZR 30/92) = BGHZ 125, 355.

[22]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1365 Rn. 11; a.A. OLG Köln Beschl. v. 2.5.2000 (Az. 26 WF 69/00) = FamRZ 2001, 176; OLG Celle Urt. v. 25.6.2003 (Az. 15 UF 30/03) = FamRZ 2004, 625, die darauf abstellen, ob das Rechtsgeschäft noch während der Anhängigkeit der abgetrennten Folgesache Zugewinnausgleich abgeschlossen worden ist, auch wenn die Scheidung bereits rechtskräftig war.

[23]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1369 Rn. 2; a.A. MüKo-Koch § 1369 Rn. 23.

[24]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1369 Rn. 2, 7.

[25]

OLG Koblenz Urt. v. 16.11.1993 (Az. 3 U 449/93) = NJW-RR 1994, 516; Palandt-Brudermüller § 1369 Rn. 4.

[26]

Staudinger-Thiele § 1369 Rn. 12.

[27]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1369 Rn. 4.

[28]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1369 Rn. 1; OLG Köln MDR 1968, 586; a.A. Soergel-Czeguhn § 1369 Rn. 19; MüKo-Koch § 1369 Rn. 13.

[29]

BGH Urt. v. 16.5.1990 (Az. XII ZR 37/89) = NJW-RR 1990, 1154.

[30]

MüKo-Koch § 1368 Rn. 5.

[31]

Müko-Koch § 1365 Rn. 3; BGH Urt. v. 23.6.1983 (Az. IX ZR 47/82) = NJW 1984, 609; OLG Brandenburg Beschl. v. 22.1.1996 (Az. 10 W 77/95) = FamRZ 1996, 1015.

[32]

Zur Prozessstandschaft siehe im Skript „Zivilprozessrecht“ Rn. 116 ff.

[33]

Müko-Koch § 1368 Rn. 14.

[34]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1368 Rn. 3 ff.

[35]

Staudinger-Thiele § 1368 Rn. 51; a.A. MüKo-Koch § 1368 Rn. 16.

[36]

BGH Urt. v. 2.2.2000 (Az. XII ZR 25/98) = FamRZ 2000, 744.

[37]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1368 Rn. 2.

[38]

BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 267/62) = BGHZ 43, 174.

[39]

BGH Urt. v. 2.2.2000 (Az. XII ZR 25/98) = BGHZ 143, 356.

[40]

BGH Beschl. v. 28.4.1961 (Az. V ZB 17/60) = BGHZ 35, 135.

[41]

BGH Urt. v. 13.3.1991 (Az. XII ZR 79/90) = NJW 1991, 1739.

[42]

BGH Beschl. v. 28.4.1961 (Az. V ZB 17/60) = BGHZ 35, 135; BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174.

[43]

BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174; BGH Urt. v. 25.6.1980 (Az. IVb ZR 516/80) = BGHZ 77, 293.

[44]

BGH Urt. v. 26.2.1965 (Az. V ZR 227/62) = BGHZ 43, 174.

[45]

BGH Urt. v. 6.10.2010 (Az. XII ZR 10/09) = FamRZ 2011, 25; a.A. Kogel Negativer Zugewinn, FamRZ 2010, 2036; Braeuer Kann der Zugewinn negativ sein?, FamRZ 2010, 1614.

[46]

BGH Urt. v. 20.6.2007 (Az. XII ZR 32/05) = FamRZ 2007, 1307 (Restitutionsanspruch); BGH Urt. v. 28.1.2004 (Az. XII ZR 221/01) = BGHZ 157, 379; BGH Urt. v. 31.10.2001 (Az. XII ZR 292/99) = NJW 2002, 436; BGH Urt. v. 15.11.2000 (Az. XII ZR 197/98) = BGHZ 146, 64; BGH Urt. v. 29.10.1981 (Az. IX ZR 86/80) = BGHZ 82, 149; MüKo-Koch § 1374 Rn. 6; Palandt-Brudermüller § 1376 Rn. 2.

[47]

BGH Urt. v. 15.11.2000 (Az. XII ZR 197/98) = BGHZ 146, 46; BGH Urt. v. 9.6.1983 (Az. IX ZR 41/82) = BGHZ 87, 367; BGH Urt. v. 14.1.1981 (Az. IVb ZR 525/8) = NJW 1981, 1038; MüKo-Koch § 1375 Rn. 12.

[48]

BGH Urt. v. 21.4.2004 (Az. XII ZR 185/01) = NJW 2004, 2675; BGH Urt. v. 11.12.2002 (Az. XII ZR 27/00) = NJW 2003, 1396.

[49]

BGH Urt. v. 24.10.1990 (Az. XII ZR 101/89) = NJW 1991, 1547; BGH Urt. v. 23.10.1985 (Az. IVb ZR 62/84) = NJW-RR 1986, 226.

[50]

Staudinger-Thiele § 1374 Rn. 17, 18.

[51]

BGBl. I S. 1696.

[52]

Brudermüller FamRZ 2009, 1185.

[53]

Brudermüller FamRZ 2009, 1185.

[54]

BGH Urt. v. 22.12.1976 (Az. IV ZR 11/76) = BGHZ 68, 43.

[55]

BGH Urt. v. 22.12.1976 (Az. IV ZR 11/76) = BGHZ 68, 43; BGH Urt. v. 27.5.1981 (Az. IVb ZR 577/80) = BGHZ 80, 384.

[56]

MüKo-Koch § 1374 Rn. 18; Staudinger-Thiele § 1374 Rn. 46.

[57]

BGH Urt. v. 7.9.2005 (Az. XII ZR 209/02) = NJW 2005, 3710; OLG Bamberg Urt. v. 20.7.1989 (Az. UF 202/88) = FamRZ 1990, 408; Staudinger-Thiele § 1374 Rn. 34.

[58]

OLG München Urt. v. 7.12.1994 (Az. 12 UF 1150/94) = FamRZ 1995, 1069.

[59]

BGH Urt. v. 20.5.1987 (Az. IVb ZR 62/86) = BGHZ 101, 65; Palandt-Brudermüller § 1374 Rn. 15; a.A. MüKo-Koch § 1374 Rn. 23.

[60]

BGH Urt. v. 26.11.1981 (Az. IX ZR 91/80) = BGHZ 82, 227.

[61]

BGH Urt. v. 3.2.2010 (Az. XII ZR 189/06) = BGHZ 184, 190; BGH Urt. v. 20.7.2011 (Az. XII ZR 149/09) = FamRZ 2012, 273.

[62]

Soergel-Lange § 1374 Rn. 14.

[63]

BGH Beschl. v. 16.11. 2016 (Az. XII ZB 362/15) = FamRZ 2017, 191.

[64]

OLG Düsseldorf Beschl. v. 7.10.1987 (Az. 10 WF 212/87) = FamRZ 1988, 287.

[65]

BGH Urt. v. 20.9.1995 (Az. XII ZR 16/94) = BGHZ 130, 377; Staudinger-Thiele § 1374 Rn. 30.

[66]

Soergel-Kappler/Kappler § 1374 Rn. 31.

[67]

OLG Koblenz Beschl. v. 30.11.2005 (Az. 7 WF 511/05) = FamRZ 2006, 624.

[68]

BGH Beschl. v. 6.5.2015 (Az. XII ZB 306/14) = BGHZ 205, 241.

[69]

BGH Urt. v. 20.9.1995 (Az. XII ZR 16/94); BGHZ 130, 377; MüKo-Koch § 1374 Rn. 189.

[70]

BGH Urt. v. 22.11.2007 (Az. XII ZR 8/05) = BGHZ 170, 324.

[71]

BGH Urt. v. 4.7.2012 (Az. XII ZR 80/10) = NJW 2012, 2657.

[72]

BGH Urt. v. 4.7.2012 (Az. XII ZR 80/10) = NJW 2012, 2657.

[73]

OLG Köln Urt. v. 1.7.1998 (Az. 27 UF 12/98) = NJW-RR 1999, 229.

[74]

BGH Urt. v. 6.10.2010 (Az. XII ZR 10/09) = FamRZ 2011, 25.

[75]

BGH Urt. v. 5.12.2018 (Az. XII ZR 116/17) = FamRZ 2019, 429.

[76]

BGH Beschl. v. 20.5.2015 (Az. XII ZB 314/14) = FamRZ 2015, 1272.

[77]

BGH Urt. v. 16.12.1982 (Az. IX ZR 90/81) = BGHZ 86, 143-152.

[78]

BGH Urt. v. 26.11.1981 (Az. IX ZR 91/80) = BGHZ 82, 234.

[79]

OLG Karlsruhe Urt. v. 30.5.2003 (5 UF 315/01) = FamRZ 2004, 1033.

[80]

BGH Urt. v. 20.12.2000 (Az. XII ZR 237/98) = NJW-RR 2001, 793; OLG Karlsruhe Urt. v. 28.3.2002 (Az. 2 UF 50/01) = NJW-RR 2003, 361-363.

[81]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1380 Rn. 15.

[82]

BGH Urt. v. 20.5.1987 (Az. IVb ZR 62/86) = BGHZ 101, 65; Palandt-Brudermüller § 1380 Rn. 13 m.w.N.; a.A. Soergel-Kappler/Kappler § 1380 Rn. 29.

[83]

BGH Urt. v. 10.7.1991 (Az. XII ZR 114/89) = BGHZ 115, 132; BGH Urt. v. 26.11.1981 (Az. IX ZR 91/80) = NJW 1982, 1093.

[84]

BGBl. I 2009, 3142.

[85]

Ermann/Schmidt-Räntsch BGB 15. Aufl. 2017 § 195 Rn. 10.

[86]

BGH Beschl. v. 20.6.2018 (Az. XII ZB 84/17) = NJW 2018, 2871.

[87]

BGH Urt. v. 21.10.1992 (Az. XII ZR 182/90) = BGHZ 119, 395.

[88]

BGH Urt. v. 9.10.1974 (Az. IV ZR 164/73) = NJW 1974, 2278.

[89]

Palandt-Sprau § 733 Rn. 10.

[90]

BGH Urt. v. 30.11.1994 (Az. XII ZR 59/93) = FamRZ 1995, 216.

[91]

BGH Urt. v. 30.11.1994 (Az. XII ZR 59/93) = FamRZ 1995, 216.

[92]

BGH Urt. v. 30.11.1994 (Az. XII ZR 59/93) = FamRZ 1995, 216.

[93]

OLG Frankfurt Beschl. v. 30.11.2000 (Az. 1 U 110/99) = FamRZ 2002, 28.

[94]

BGH Urt. v. 9.1.2008 (Az. XII ZR 184/05) = FamRZ 2008, 602; BGH Urt. v. 11.5.2005 (Az. XII ZR 289/02) = FamRZ 2005, 1236.

[95]

BGH Beschl. v. 29.6.2017 (IX ZB 98/16) = BGHZ 215, 139.

[96]

BGH Beschl. v. 20.5.2015 (XII ZB 314/14) = NJW-RR 2015, 897.

[97]

BGH Urt. v. 25.3.2015 (XII ZR 160/12) = FamRZ 2015, 997.

[98]

BGH Urt. v. 5.4.1989 (Az. IVb ZR 35/88) = FamRZ 1989, 835.

[99]

BGH Beschl. v. 20.5.2015 (Az. XII ZB 314/14) = NJW-RR 2015, 897.

[100]

BGH Urt. v. 29.11.1989 (Az. IVb ZR 4/89) = NJW 1990, 705.

[101]

BGH Urt. v. 13.7.1994 (Az. XII ZR 1/93) = BGHZ 127, 48; BGH Urt. v. 21.10.1992 (Az. XII ZR 182/90) = BGHZ 119, 392; BGH Urt. v. 17.1.1990 (Az. XII ZR 1/89) = FamRZ 1990, 600.

[102]

Siehe dazu auch im Skript „Schuldrecht BT I“ unter Rn. 452.

[103]

BGH Urt. v. 14.3.2018 (Az. IV ZR 170/16) = FamRZ 2018, 775.

[104]

BGH Urt. v. 10.7.1991 (Az. XII ZR 114/89) = BGHZ 115, 132.

[105]

BGH Urt. v. 10.7.1991 (Az. XII ZR 114/89) = BGHZ 115, 132 m.w.N.

[106]

BGH Urt. v. 3.2.2010 (Az. XII ZR 189/06) = BGHZ 184, 190; BGH Urt. v. 20.7.2011 (Az. XII ZR 149/09) = FamRZ 2012, 273.

[107]

BGH Urt. v. 28.9.2005 (Az. XII ZR 189/02) = BGHZ 165, 1 ff.

[108]

BGH Urt. v. 30.6.1999 (Az. XII ZR 230/96) = BGHZ 142, 137.

[109]

BGH Urt. v. 30.6.1999 (Az. XII ZR 230/96) = BGHZ 142, 137.

[110]

BGH Urt. v. 25.6.2003 (Az. XII ZR 161/01) = BGHZ 155, 249.

[111]

BGH Urt. v. 28.9.2005 (Az. XII ZR 189/02) = BGHZ 165, 1.

[112]

BGH Urt. v. 30.6.1999 (Az. XII ZR 230/96) = BGHZ 142, 137.

[113]

BGH Urt. v. 24.1.1958 (Az. IV ZR 234/57) = BGHZ 26, 281.

[114]

BGH Urt. v. 1.4.1998 (Az. XII ZR 278/96) = NJW 1998, 1857.

[115]

Vgl. dazu Staudinger-Thiele Vorb. § 1408 Rn. 33; a.A. OLG Schleswig, Beschl. v. 10.4.1995 (Az. 2 W 138/94) = NJW-RR 1996, 134; offen BGH Urt. v. 26.3.1997 (Az. XII ZR 250/95) = NJW 1997, 2239.

[116]

Palandt-Brudermüller § 1408 Rn. 23 m.w.N.

[117]

BVerfG Urt. v. 6.2.2001 (Az. 1 BvR 12/92) = NJW 2001, 957; BGH Urt. v. 11.2.2004 (Az. XII ZR 265/02) = NJW 2004, 930; BGH Urt. v. 9.7.2008 (Az. XII ZR 6/07) = FamRZ 2008, 2011.

[118]

BVerfG Urt. v. 6.2.2001 (Az. 1 BvR 12/92) = NJW 2001, 957.

[119]