Читать книгу Pollutants and Water Management - Группа авторов - Страница 50

2.3.7.2 Resource User Groups and their Socio‐Economic Status and Dependency

Оглавление

All the responses of the questionnaire survey were summed up and RUGs were decided on a ranking basis (Fisher 2004). The Kanwar wetland resource users were categorized into three groups, namely Landowner, Laborer, and Business. The maximum (53%) respondents belonged to the labor group, followed by the landowner (27%) and small‐scale business (20%) groups. The landowners had their registered land of a good amount (>20 katha, i.e. 0.3 ha), whereas the other two groups did not have registered land. These groups used to get land on lease from landowners. The labor group population was deprived in education, pakka housing, and land (Table 2.7). Their annual income was in the range of INR 12 500–25 000 household/year, which was less than the landowners (INR 25 000–125 000 household/year) and business (INR 15 000–50 000 household/year). The source of income of all RUGs was mainly based on agricultural yields. Most of the RUG population was unemployed and directly dependent for their livelihood on different materials from the wetland (Table 2.8).

Table 2.6 Changes in village‐wise population and number of households.

S. no. Village Population Number of households
2001 2011 Change % change Rate (per year) 2001 2011 Change % change Rate (per year)
1 Manjhaul 31 261 35 905 4644 14.86 465 5336 7372 2036 38.16 204
2 Jaimangalpur 1774 2309 535 30.16 53.5 373 507 134 35.92 14
3 Jaimangalgarh 538 731 193 35.87 20 130 175 45 34.62 5
4 Ekamba 4803 6923 2120 44.14 212 793 1471 678 85.50 68
5 Parora 4251 6353 2102 49.45 211 792 1275 483 60.98 49
6 Narayanpiper 5396 7451 2055 38.08 206 1015 1541 526 51.82 53
7 Sakra 3354 4416 1062 31.66 107 591 973 382 64.64 39
8 Rajaur 4420 6075 1655 37.44 166 832 1391 559 67.19 56
9 Kanausi 2179 3831 1652 75.81 166 454 857 403 88.77 41
10 Manikpur 2849 3150 301 10.57 31 507 611 104 20.51 11
Total 60 825 77 144 16 319 26.86 1632 10 823 16 173 5350 49.43 535

Figure 2.11 Village‐wise literacy.

Table 2.7 Socio‐economic characteristics of three resource user groups based on a questionnaire survey (N = 147).

S. no. Characteristics Labor Landowner Business
1 Households (%) 53.06 26.53 20.41
2 Average household size 7.2 6.4 6.6
3 Literacy (%) 31 46 42
4 Pakka houses (%) 31 81 41
5 Electrified households (%) 13 81 31
6 Cattle owning households (%) 82.4 76.34 41.65
7 Landholding (mean ± SD) (ha) 0.015 ± 0.003 1.6 ± 0.72 0.4 ± 0.08
8 Involved in agriculture (%) 92 100 85
9 Engaged in other services (%) 21
10 Unemployment (%) 78
11 Average household income (INR/household/year) 18 500 ± 2532 60 000 ± 2632 37 000 ± 1236
Pollutants and Water Management

Подняться наверх