Читать книгу Communicating in Risk, Crisis, and High Stress Situations: Evidence-Based Strategies and Practice - Vincent T. Covello - Страница 75

Below are additional resources to expand on the content presented in this chapter.

1 Árvai, J., and Rivers, L. III., eds. (2014). Effective Risk Communication. London: Earthscan.

2 Arvai, J., and Campbell‐Arvai, V. (2014). “Risk Communication: Insights from the Decision Sciences.” in Effective Risk Communication, eds. J. Arvai and L. Rivers III. London: Taylor and Francis.

3 Andrews, R. (1999). Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

4 Aufder Heide, E. (2004). “Common misconceptions about disasters: Panic, the “disaster syndrome,” and looting,” in The First 72 Hours: A Community Approach to Disaster Preparedness, ed. M. O’Leary. Lincoln, NB: iUniverse Publishing.

5  Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

6 Beck, M., and Kewell, B. (2014). Risk: A Study of Its Origins, History and Politics. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing Company.

7 Becker, S. (2004). Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2(3):195–207.

8 Bennett, P., and Calman, K., eds. (1999). Risk Communication and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press.

9 Bennett, P., Coles, D., and McDonald, A. (1999). “Risk communication as a decision process,” in Risk Communication and Public Health, eds. P. Bennett and K. Calman. New York: Oxford University Press.

10 Bier, V.M. (2001). “On the state of the art: risk communication to the public.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 71(2):139–150.

11 Bohnenblust, H., and Slovic, P. (1998). “Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk based decision making.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59:151–159.

12 Boholm, Å. (2019). “Risk communication as government agency organizational practice.” Risk Analysis ( 39)8:1695–1707.

13 Boin, A., Rhinard, M., and Ekengren, M. (2014). “Managing transboundary crises: the emergence of European Union Capacity.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22(3):131–142.

14 Boin, A., Hart, P., Stern, E. and Sundelius, B. (2005). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

15 Bostrom, A. (2003). “Future risk communication.” Futures 35:553–573.

16 Bostrom, A., Atman, C., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M.G. (1994). “Evaluating risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part II.” Risk Analysis 14 (5):789–797.

17 Breakwell, G.M. (2007). The Psychology of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Crisis and Emergency Risk communication. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

19 Chess, C., Hance, B.J., and Sandman, P. M. (1986). Planning Dialogue with Communities: A Risk Communication Workbook. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Cook College, Environmental Media Communication Research Program.

20 Chess, C., Hance, B.J., and Sandman, P.M. (1988). Improving Dialogue with Communities: A Short Guide to Government Risk Communication. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

21 Chess, C., Hance, B.J., and Sandman, P.M. (1989). Planning Dialogue with Communities. A Risk Communication Workbook. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Cook College, Environmental Communication Research Program.

22 Chess, C., Salomone, K.L., and Hance, B.J. (1995). “Improving risk communication in government: research priorities.” Risk Analysis 15 (2):127–135.

23 Chess, C., Salomone, K.L., Hance, B.J., and Saville, A. (1995). “Results of a national symposium on risk communication: next steps for government agencies.” Risk Analysis 15 (2):115–120.

24 Cvetkovich, G., Vlek, C.A., and Earle, T.C. (1989). “Designing technological hazard information programs: towards a model of risk‐adaptive decision making,” in Social Decision Methodology for Technical Projects, eds. C.A.J. Vlek, G. Cvetkovich. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

25 Coombs, W.T. (1998). “An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation.” Journal of Public Relations Research 10(3):177–192.

26 Coombs, W. (1999). Ongoing Crisis Communications: Planning, Managing, and Responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

27  Coombs, W.T. (2007). “Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory.” Corporate Reputation Review 10(3):163–176.

28 Covello, V. (1992). “Risk communication, trust, and credibility.” Health and Environmental Digest 6(1):1–4.

29 Covello, V. (1993). “Risk communication, trust, and credibility.” Journal of Occupational Medicine 35:18–19.

30 Covello, V.T (1993). “Risk communication and occupational medicine.” Journal of Occupational Medicine 35:18–19.

31 Covello, V.T. (2003). “Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication.” Journal of Health Communication, 8(Supplement):5–8.

32 Covello, V.T. (2006). “Risk communication and message mapping: a new tool for communicating effectively in public health emergencies and disasters.” Journal of Emergency Management 4(3):25–40.

33 Covello, V.T. (2005). “Risk communication”. In Environmental Health: From Global to Local, ed. Frumkin, H. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass/Wiley:988–1008.

34 Covello, V.T. (2014). “Risk communication,” in Environmental Health: From Global to Local. 5th edition), ed. H. Frumkin. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass/Wiley.

35 Covello, V., and Allen, F. (1988). Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis.

36 Covello, V., and Merkhofer, M. (1993). Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks. New York: Plenum Press.

37 Covello, V., McCallum, D., and Pavlova, M., eds. (1989) Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations. New York: Plenum Press.

38 Covello, V., Peters, R., Wojtecki, J., and Hyde, R. (2001). “Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bio‐terrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting.” Journal of Urban Health 78(2):382–391.

39 Covello, V., Sandman, P., and Slovic, P. (1988). Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Numbers. Washington, DC: CMA.

40 Covello, V., and Sandman, P. (2001). “Risk communication: Evolution and revolution,” in Solutions to an Environment in Peril, ed. A. Wolbarst. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

41 Covello, V., Slovic, P., and von Winterfeldt, D. (1986). “Risk communication: A review of the literature.” Risk Abstracts 3(4):171–182.

42 Covello, V., Minamyer, S., and Clayton, K. (2007). Effective Risk and Crisis Communication during Water Security Emergencies . EPA Policy Report; EPA 600‐R07‐027. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

43 Covello, V., and Sandman, P.M., (2001). Risk communication: Evolution and revolution, in Solutions to an environment in peril, ed. A. Wolbarst (Ed.; in press). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press: 166–178.

44 Covello, V., Slovic, P., and von Winterfeld, D. (1987). Risk Communication: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

45 Cox Jr., A.L. (2012). “Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis.” Risk Analysis 32 (10):1607–1629.

46 Cvetkovich, G., Siegrist, M., Murray R., and Tragesser, S. (2002). “New information and social trust asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers.” Risk Analysis 22(2):359–367.

47 Dietz, T. (2013). “Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:14081–14087.

48  Dunwoody, S. (2014). “Science journalism,” in Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, eds. M. Bucchi and B. Trench. New York: Routledge.

49 Earle, T.C. (2010). “Trust in risk management: A model‐based review of empirical research.” Risk Analysis 30(4):541–574.

50 Earle, T.C., and Siegrist, M. (2008). “On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management.” Risk Analysis 28(5):1395–1414.

51 Federal Emergency Management Agency (2021). FEMA Flood Risk Communication Toolkit for Community Officials. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

52 Fearn‐Banks, K. (2007). Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

53 Fischhoff, B. (1989). “Helping the public make health risk decisions. In Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations”, eds. Covello, V., McCallum, D.B., Pavlova, M.T. New York, NY: Plenum Press: 111–116.

54 Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, L., Read, S., and Combs, B. (1978). “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits.” Policy Sciences 9:127–152.

55 Fischhoff, B. (1995a). “Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process.” Risk Analysis 15(2):137–145.

56 Fischhoff, B. (1995b). “Strategies for risk communication. Appendix C.” in National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

57 Fischhoff, B. (2012). Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Earthscan.

58 Fischhoff, B. (2013). “The Sciences of Science Communication,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3):14033–14039.

59 Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N.T., and Downs, J.S., eds. (2011). Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence‐based User’s Guide. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration.

60 Fischhoff, B., and Davis, A.L. (2014). “Communicating scientific uncertainty,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (Suppl. 4): 13664–13671.

61 Fischhoff, B., and Kadvany, J. (2011). Risk: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

62 Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., and Keeney, D. (1981). Acceptable Risk. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

63 Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C.K. (1994). “Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.” Risk Analysis 14(6):1101–1108.

64 Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

65 Glik D.C. (2007). “Risk communication for public health emergencies.” Annual Review of Public Health 28(1):33–54.

66 Hance, B. J., Chess, C., and Sandman, P. M. (1990). Industry Risk Communication Manual. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Lewis Publishers.

67 Halvorsen, P. A. (2010). “What information do patients need to make a medical decision?” Medical Decision Making 30 (5 Suppl):11S–13S.

68 Haight, J.M., ed. (2008). The Safety Professionals Handbook: Technical Applications. Des Plaines, IL: The American Society of Safety Engineers.

69 Heath, R., and O’Hair, D., eds. (2009). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge.

70 Hess, R., Visschers, V.H.M., Siegrist, M., and Keller, C. (2011). “How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy.” Journal of Risk Research 14(1):47–61.

71 Hyer, R.N., and Covello, V.T. (2007). Effective Media Communication During Public Health Emergencies: A World Health Organization Handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization Publications.

72  Jardine, C.G., Driedger S.M. (2014). “Risk communication for empowerment: an ultimate or elusive goal?” in Effective Risk Communication, eds J. Arvai and L. Rivers III. London: Earthscan.

73 Hyer, R., and Covello, V. (2007). Effective Media Communication during Public Health Emergencies: A World Health Organization Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

74 Johnson, B.B., and Covello, V. (1987). The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk: Essays on Risk Selection and Perception. Dordrecht, Holland: D.Reidel Publishing.

75 Joslyn, S., and LeClerc, J. (2012). “Uncertainty forecasts improve weather related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:126–140.

76 Joslyn, S., Nadav‐Greenberg, L., Taing, M.U., and Nichols, R.M. (2009). “The effects of wording on the understanding and use of uncertainty information in a threshold forecasting decision.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23:55–72.

77 Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan Publishers.

78 Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

79 Kahneman, D. Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica, 47(2):263–291.

80 Kasperson, R.E. (1986). “Six Propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication.” Risk Analysis 6(3):275–281.

81 Kasperson, R.E. (2014). “Four questions for risk communication.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (10):1233–1239.

82 Kasperson, R.E., Golding, D., and Tuler, S. (1992). “Social distrust as a factor in sitting hazardous facilities and communicating risks.” Journal of Social Issues 48(4):161–187.

83 Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H.S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., and Ratick, S. (1987). “Social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework.” Risk Analysis 8 (2):177–187.

84 Kasperson, R., Kasperson, J.X., and Golding, D. (1999). “Risk, Trust, and Democratic Theory,” in Social Trust and the Management of Risk, eds. G. Cvetkovich, R. Löfstedt. London: Earthscan.

85 Kasperson, R. E., and Stallen, P.J.M. eds. (1991). Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

86 Krimsky, S., and Plough, A. (1988). Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process. Dover, MA: Auburn House.

87 Löftstedt, R. (2003). “Risk communication. pitfalls and promises.” European Review 11 (3):417–435.

88 Liess, W. (1996). “Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice.” Annals of the American Academy of Political Social Science 545 (1):85–94.

89 Löfstedt, R. (2005). Risk Management in Post‐Trust Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

90 Löfstedt, R.E., and Bouder, F. (2014). “New transparency policies: Risk communication’s doom?” in Effective Risk Communication, eds J. Àrvai and L. Rivers III. London: Earthscan.

91 Lindenfeld, L., Smith, H., Norton, T., and Grecu, N. (2014). “Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field.” Sustainability Science 9 (2):119–127.

92 Lundgren, R.E., and McMakin A.H. (2018). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐IEEE Press.

93 McComas, K.A. (2006). “Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996–2005.” Journal of Health Communication 11(1):75–91.

94 McComas, K.A., Arvai, J., and Besley, J.C. (2009). “Linking public participation and decision making through risk communication,” in Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, eds. R. Heath and D. O’Hair. New York: Routledge.

95 Mileti, D., Nathe, S., Gori, P., Greene, M., and Lemersal, E. (2004). Public Hazards Communication and Education: The State of the Art. Boulder, Colo.: Natural Hazards Center.

96  Morgan, B., B. Fischoff, A. Bostrom, L. Lave, and C.J. Atman (1992). “Communicating risk to the public”. Environmental Science and Technology 26:2048–2056.

97 Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Atman, C.J. (2002). Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

98 National Research Council (1989). Improving Risk Communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

99 National Research Council (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

100 National Research Council) (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

101 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce. (2016). Risk Communication and Behavior. Best Practices and Research. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

102 National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (2008). “Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making,” in Panel on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, eds. T. Dietz and P.C. Stern. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

103 National Academy of Sciences (2014). The Science of Science Communication II: Summary of a Colloquium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

104 National Academy of Sciences (2017). Communicating Science Effectively. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

105 Olsson, E. (2014). “Crisis communication in public organizations: dimensions of crisis communication revisited.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22(2):113–125.

106 Olsson, E. (2015). “Transboundary crisis networks: the challenge of coordination in the face of global threats.” Risk Management 17(2):91–108.

107 Peters, E. (2012). “Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(1): 31–35.

108 Peters, R., McCallum, D., and Covello, V. T. (1997). “The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study.” Risk Analysis 17(1):43–54.

109 Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., and Slovic, P. (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

110 Renn, O. (1992). “Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 29: 465–579.

111 Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London, UK: Earthscan.

112 Renn, O., and Levin, D. (1991). “Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication,” in Communicating Risks to the Public, eds. R. Kasperson and P. Stallen. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

113 Reynolds, B. (2014). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. Atlanta, GA: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

114 Reynolds B., and Seeger, M.W. (2005). “Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model.” Journal of Health Communication 10:43–55.

115 Ripley, A. (2009). The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes ‐ And Why. New York: Harmony Books.

116 Rodrıguez, H., Dıaz, W., Santos, J., and Aguirre, B. (2007). “Communicating risk and uncertainty: science, technology, and disasters at the crossroads,” in Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer.

117  Rogers, E.M. (1996). “The field of health communication today: An up‐to‐date report.” Journal of Health Communication 1 (1):15–23.

118 Sandman, P.M. (1989). “Hazard versus outrage in the public perception of risk,” in Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Non‐Government Organizations, eds. V.T. Covello, D.B. McCallum, M.T. Pavlova. New York: Plenum Press.

119 Sandman, P.M (1993). Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication. Fairfax, Va.: AIHA Press,

120 Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., and Roth, C. (2000). “Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception.” Risk Analysis 20(3):353–361.

121 Seeger, M.W. (2006). “Best practices in crisis communication: an expert panel process.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34(3):232–44.

122 Sheppard, B., Janoske, M., and Liu, B. (2012). “Understanding Risk Communication Theory: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators.” Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, US Department of Homeland Security. College Park, MD: US Department of Homeland Security.

123 Slovic, P. (1987). “Perception of risk.” Science 236 (4799):280–285.

124 Slovic, P. (1993). “Perceived risk, trust, and democracy.” Risk Analysis 13(6):675–682.

125 Slovic, P. (1999). “Trust, emotion, and sex.” Risk Analysis 19(4):689–701.

126 Slovic, P. ed. (2000). The Perception of Risk. London, UK: Earthscan.

127 Slovic, P., ed. (2010). The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception. London: EarthScan.

128 Slovic, P. (2016). “Understanding perceived risk: 1978‐2015.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 58(1):25–29.

129 Slovic, P., M. Finucane, L., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D.G. (2004). “Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.” Risk Analysis 24(2):311–322.

130 Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. (2001). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In The Perception of Risk, ed. Slovic, P. (pp. 137–153). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

131 Slovic, P., Krauss, N., and Covello, V. (1990). What should we know about making risk comparisons. Risk Analysis 10:389–392.

132 Stallen, P.J.M., and Tomas, A. (1988). “Public concerns about industrial hazards.” Risk Analysis 8(2):235–245.

133 Steelman, T. A., McCaffrey, S. (2013). “Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management.” Natural Hazards 65(1):683–705.

134 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2019). Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials. SAMHSA Publication No. PEP19‐01‐01‐005. Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

135 Thompson, K.M., and Bloom, D.L. (2000). “Communication of risk assessment information to risk managers.” Journal of Risk Research 3:333–352.

136 Tuler, S.P., and Kasperson, R.E. (2014). “Social distrust and its implications for risk communication: an example of high‐level radioactive waste management,” in Effective Risk Communication, eds. J. Arvai and L. Rivers III. London: Earthscan.

137 Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185(4157):1124–1131.

138 Tversky A, and Kaheman, D. (1986). “Rational choice and the framing of decisions.” Journal of Business 59:5251–5278.

139 US Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Superfund Community Involvement Handbook. EPA 540‐K‐05‐003. Washington, D.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency.

140  US Environmental Protection Agency (2007). Risk Communication in Action. Washington, D.C. US Environmental Protection Agency.

141 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

142 U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2020). Hazard Communication. Accessed at: https://www.osha.gov/hazcom

143 U.S. Navy Environmental Health Center (NEHC) (2002): Risk Communication Primer, 2nd edition. Norfolk, Va.: Navy Environmental Health Center.

144 Walaski, (Ferrante), P. (2011). Risk and Crisis Communications: Methods and Messages. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

145 Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self‐Protective Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

146 Weinstein, N.D. (1980). “Unrealistic optimism about future life events”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:106–120.

147 Weinstein, N.D. (1982). “Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems”. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 5:441–460.

148 Wildavsky, A., and Dake, K. (1990). “Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why”. Daedalus 112:41–60.

149 Wildavsky, A., and Douglas, M. (1983). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

150 Wood, M.M., Mileti, D.S., Kano, M., Kelley, M.M., Regan, R., and Bourque, L.B. (2011). “Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards.” Risk Analysis 34(4):601–615.

151 World Health Organization (2004). Outbreak Communication: Best Practices for Communicating with the Public during an Outbreak. Geneva: World Health Organization.

152 World Health Organization (2017). Communicating Risk in Public Health Emergencies: A Who Guideline for Emergency Risk Communication (Erc) Policy and Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.

153 Yang, H. Pang, X., Zheng, B., Wang, L., Wang, Y. Du, S., and Lu, X, (2020). “A strategy study on risk communication of pandemic influenza.” Risk Management and Health Policy 13:1447–1458.