Читать книгу Manual de goniometría - Cynthia C. Norkin - Страница 79
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Оглавление1. Rothstein, JM y Echternach, JL: Primer on Measurement: An Introductory Guide to Measurement Issues. American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, 1993.
2. APTA: Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 3.0. Alexandria, VA, American Physical Therapy Association, 2014. Disponible en [http://guide topractice.apta.org].
3. Portney, LG y Watkins, MP: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3.a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, PA, 2015.
4. Sim, J y Arnell, P: Measurement validity in physical therapy research. Phys Ther 73:102, 1993.
5. Gajdosik, RL y Bohannon, RW: Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 67:1867, 1987.
6. Piriyaprasarth, P y Morris ME: Psychometric properties of measurement tools for quantifying knee joint position and movement: A systematic review. Knee 14:2, 2007.
7. Milani, P, et al: Mobile smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: A review of goniometric tools. PM&R 6: 1038, 2014.
8. Gogia, PP, et al: Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther 67:192, 1987.
9. Enwemeka, CS: Radiographic verification of knee goniometry. Scand J Rehabil Med 18:47, 1986.
10. Ahlback, SO y Lindahl, O: Sagittal mobility of the hip-joint. Acta Orthop Scand 34:310, 1964.
11. Kato, M, et al: The accuracy of goniometric measurements of proximal interphalangeal joints in fresh cadavers: Comparison between methods of measurement, types of goniometers, and fingers. J Hand Ther 20:12, 2007.
12. Chen, J, et al: Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24:1571, 1999.
13. Herrmann, DB: Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11:414, 1990.
14. Ordway, NR, et al: Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods: Cervical range-of-motion device, space, and radiography. Spine 22:501, 1997.
15. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine 25:324, 2000.
16. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:242, 2006.
17. Macrae, JF y Wright, V: Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 28:584, 1969.
18. Portek, I, et al: Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheumatol 22:197, 1983.
19. Burdett, RG, Brown, KE y Fall, MP: Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions. Phys Ther 66:677, 1986.
20. Mayer, TG, et al: Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 9:588, 1984.
21. Saur, PM, et al: Lumbar range of motion: Reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 21:1332, 1996.
22. Samo, DG, et al: Validity of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: Surface inclinometers compared with radiographs. J Occup Environ Med 39:209, 1997.
23. Vasen, AP, et al: Functional range of motion of the elbow. J Hand Surg Br 20A:288, 1995.
24. Cooper, JE, et al: Elbow joint restriction: Effect on functional upper limb motion during performance of three feeding activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:805, 1993.
25. Nelson, DL: Functional wrist motion. Hand Clin 13:83, 1997.
26. Hermann, KM y Reese, CS: Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorder. Phys Ther 81:903, 2001.
27. Triffitt, PD: The relationship between motion of the shoulder and the stated ability to perform activities of daily living. J Bone Joint Surg 80:41, 1998.
28. Wagner, MB, et al: Assessment of hand function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:801, 1993.
29. Waddell, G, et al: Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine 17:617, 1992.
30. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Ginebra, 2001.
31. Scalzitti, DA: Examination of Function. En: O’Sullivan, SB, Schmitz, TJ y Fulk, GD (eds): Physical Rehabilitation, 6.a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2014.
32. Moore, ML: Clinical Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Basmajian, JV (ed): Therapeutic Exercise, 3.a ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1978.
33. Miller, PJ: Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Rothstein, JM (ed): Measurement in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Nueva York, 1985.
34. Lea, RD y Gerhardt, JJ: Current concepts review: Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:784, 1995.
35. Williams, MA, et al: A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 33:138, 2010.
36. Van de Pol, R, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:7, 2010.
37. Van Trijffel E, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:223, 2010.
38. Grohmann, JE: Comparison of two methods of goniometry. Phys Ther 63:922, 1983.
39. Hamilton, GF y Lachenbruch, PA: Reliability of goniometers in assessing finger joint angle. Phys Ther 49:465, 1969.
40. Boone, DC, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 58:1355, 1978.
41. Pandya, S, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther 65:1339, 1985.
42. Bovens, AM, et al: Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sport Med 18:58, 1990.
43. Hellebrandt, FA, Duvall, EN y Moore, ML: The measurement of joint motion. Part III: Reliability of goniometry. Phys Ther Rev 29:302, 1949.
44. Low, JL: The reliability of joint measurement. Physiotherapy 62:227, 1976.
45. Greene, BL y Wolf, SL: Upper extremity joint movement: Comparison of two measurement devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:299, 1989.
46. Tucci, SM, et al: Cervical motion assessment: A new, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:225, 1986.
47. Youdas, JW, Carey, JR y Garrett, TR: Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion: Comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71:2, 1991.
48. Fitzgerald, GK, et al: Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spine range of motion. Phys Ther 63:1776, 1983.
49. Nitschke, JE, et al: Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides’ model for measuring spinal range of motion. Spine 24:262, 1999.
50. Mayerson, NH y Milano, RA: Goniometric measurement reliability in physical medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65:92, 1984.
51. Watkins, MA, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther 71:90, 1991.
52. Riddle, DL, Rothstein, JM y Lamb, RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: Shoulder measurements. Phys Ther 67:668, 1987.
53. Ekstrand, J, et al: Lower extremity goniometric measurements: A study to determine their reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:171, 1982.
54. Rothstein, JM, Miller, PJ y Roettger, RF: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: Elbow and knee measurements. Phys Ther 63:1611, 1983.
55. Solgaard, S, et al: Reproducibility of goniometry of the wrist. Scand J Rehabil Med 18:5, 1986.
56. Lovell, FW, Rothstein, JM y Personius, WJ: Reliability of clinical measurements of lumbar lordosis taken with a flexible rule. Phys Ther 69:96, 1989.
57. Bartlett, JD, et al: Hip flexion contractures: A comparison of measurement methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:620, 1985.
58. Jonson, SR y Gross, MT: Intraexaminer reliability, interexaminer reliability, and mean values for nine lower extremity skeletal measures in healthy naval midshipmen. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 25:253, 1997.
59. Elveru, RA, Rothstein, JM y Lamb, RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Phys Ther 68:672, 1988.
60. Diamond, JE, et al: Reliability of a diabetic foot evaluation. Phys Ther 69:797, 1989.
61. MacDermid, JC, et al: Intratester and intertester reliability of goniometric measurement of passive lateral shoulder rotation. J Hand Ther 12:187, 1999.
62. Armstrong, AD, et al: Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:573, 1998.
63. Boon, AJ y Smith, J: Manual scapular stabilization: Its effect on shoulder rotational range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:978, 2000.
64. Horger, MM: The reliability of goniometric measurements of active and passive wrist motions. Am J Occup Ther 44:342, 1990.
65. Ellis, B, Bruton, A y Goddard, JR: Joint angle measurement: A comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand. Clin Rehabil 11:314, 1997.
66. Pellecchia, GL y Bohannon, RW: Active lateral neck flexion range of motion measurements obtained with a modified goniometer. Reliability and estimates of normal. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 21:443, 1998.
67. Nilsson, N: Measuring passive cervical motion: A study of reliability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18:293, 1995.
68. Williams, R, et al: Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther 73:26, 1993.
69. Defibaugh, JJ: Measurement of head motion. Part II: An experimental study of head motion in adult males. Phys Ther 44:163, 1964.
70. Balogun, JA, et al: Interand intratester reliability of measuring neck motions with tape measure and Myrin Gravity-Reference Goniometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 10:248, 1989.
71. Capuano-Pucci, D, et al: Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:338, 1991.
72. LaStayo, PC y Wheeler, DL: Reliability of passive wrist flexion and extension goniometric measurements: A multicenter study. Phys Ther 74:162, 1994.
73. Macedo, LG y Magee DJ: Effects of age on passive range of motion of selected peripheral joints in healthy adult females. Physiother Theory Pract 25:145, 2009.
74. Mayer, TG, et al: Spinal range of motion. Spine 22:1976, 1997.
75. Cobe, HM: The range of active motion at the wrist of white adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br 10:763, 1928.
76. Hewitt, D: The range of active motion at the wrist of women. J Bone Joint Surg Br 10:775, 1928.
77. Palmer, ML y Epler, M: Clinical Assessment Procedures in Physical Therapy, 2.a ed. JB Lippincott, Filadelfia, 1998.
78. Clarkson, HM: Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Range of Motion and Manual Muscle Strength, 2.a ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 2000.
79. Robson, P: A method to reduce the variable error in joint range measurement. Ann Phys Med 8:262, 1966.
80. Mullaney, MJ, et al: Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract 26:327, 2010.
81. Goodwin, J, et al: Clinical methods of goniometry: A comparative study. Disabil Rehabil 14:10, 1992.
82. Petherick, M, et al: Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion. Phys Ther 68:966, 1988.
83. Brown, A, et al: Validity and reliability of the Dexter hand evaluation and therapy system in hand-injured patients. J Hand Ther 13:37, 2000.
84. Weiss, PL, et al: Using the Exos Handmaster to measure digital range of motion: Reliability and validity. Med Eng Phys 16:323, 1994.
85. Clapper, MP y Wolf, SL: Comparison of the reliability of the Ortho Ranger and the standard goniometer for assessing active lower extremity range of motion. Phys Ther 68:214, 1988.
86. Ellison, JB, Rose, SJ y Sahrman, SA: Patterns of hip rotation: A comparison between healthy subjects and patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 70:537, 1990.
87. Rheault, W, et al: Intertester reliability and concurrent validity of fluid-based and universal goniometers for active knee flexion. Phys Ther 68:1676, 1988.
88. Rome, K y Cowieson, F: A reliability study of the universal goniometer, fluid goniometer, and electrogoniometer for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle Int 17:28, 1996.
89. Reynolds, PM: Measurement of spinal mobility: A comparison of three methods. Rheumatol Rehabil 14:180, 1975.
90. Miller, MH, et al: Measurement of spinal mobility in the sagittal plane: New skin distraction technique compared with established methods. Br J Rheumatol 11:4, 1984.
91. Gill, K, et al: Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 13:50, 1988.
92. Lindahl, O: Determination of the sagittal mobility of the lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Scand 37:241, 1966.
93. Mayer, RS, et al: Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. Spine 20:1489, 1995.
94. Chen, SP, et al: Reliability of the lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: Surface inclinometers. J Occup Environ Med 39:217, 1997.
95. Breum, J, Wilberg, J y Bolton, JE: Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18:497, 1995.
96. Colton, T: Statistics in Medicine. Little, Brown, Boston, 1974.
97. Fetters, L y Tilson, J. Evidence Based Physical Therapy. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2013.
98. Di Fabio, RD. Essentials of Rehabilitation Research: A Statistical Guide to Clinical Practice. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2013.
99. Bland, JM y Altman, DG: Measurement error and correlation coefficients [statistics notes]. BMJ 313:41, 1996.
100. Lahey, MA, Downey, RG y Saal, FE: Intraclass correlations: There’s more there than meets the eye. Psychol Bull 93:586, 1983.
101. Shrout, PE y Fleiss, JL: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420, 1979.
102. Weir, JP: Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231, 2005.
103. Stratford, P: Reliability: Consistency or differentiating among subjects? [letters to the editor]. Phys Ther 69:299, 1989.
104. Bland, JM y Altman, DG: Measurement error [statistics notes]. BMJ 312:1654, 1996.
105. Rothstein, JM: Measurement and Clinical Practice: Theory and Application. En: Rothstein, JM (ed): Measurement in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Nueva York, 1985, p 41.
106. DuBois, PH: An Introduction to Psychological Statistics. Harper & Row, Nueva York, 1965, p 401.
107. Riddle, DL y Stratford, PW: Is This Change Real? Interpreting Patient Outcomes in Physical Therapy. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2013.
108. Bartko, JJ: Rationale for reporting standard deviations rather than standard errors of the mean. Am J Psychiatry 142:1060, 1985.
109. Stratford, P: Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: An applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 77:745, 1997.
110. Eliasziw, M, et al: Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: Using goniometric measurement as an example. Phys Ther 74:777, 1994.
111. Stratford, PW y Riddle, DL: When minimal detectable change exceeds a diag nostic test-based threshold change value for an outcome measure: Resolving the conflict. Phys Ther 92:1338, 2012.
112. Haley, SM y Fragala-Pinkham, MA: Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 86:735, 2006.
